Twitch, the widely known platform that allows users to broadcast themselves live, has launched a brand new policy on enforcement and punishment of its community guidelines violators which could be described as a mix of justice and rehabilitation. This paper looks in detail to Twitch’s new program with striking features such as expiring strikes, transparency and enhancement of education .
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/23951421/STK044_VRG_Illo_N_Barclay_1_twitch.jpg)
Expiring Strikes for Low Severity Offenses
Twitch’s latest enforcement strategy includes the introduction of time limit called ‘expiring strikes’. Under this system, users who for instance accidentally show partial nudity will only pay appeals for a set period. Thereafter, it will be wiped out and the affected users will be free to play on the account.
The American company’s policy shift, however, is in the context of the strategy that welcomed strikes in the first place, that is, the approach that struck a user one strike after the other without ceasing. In addition to drawing the line on acceptable behavior, Aguilar and the rest of the team seeks to reaffirm twitch’s core philosophy of allowing all vices to exist within the ecosystem but straightened by member’s conduct policies.
More Transparency More Education
Apart from expiring strikes, Twitch is also promoting further transparency and educational measures to those who come under enforcement action. Beginning with 2023, Twitch will furnish the users with the relevant message sent in chat or video leading to the enforcement, in order for them to comprehend the reasons or actions that elicited particular responses, e.g., suspensions.
Also, it has undertaken, in collaboration with alt-right groups like the Anti-Defamation League, the creation of educational materials like courses and quizzes on subjects such as hate speech, sexual harassment, and gambling. Users who are willing to participate in such activities to complete the course may be eligible for a further reduction of their suspension period, thus emphasizing that Twitch aids rehabilitation and development rather than mere punishment.
It is such a welcome change especially in regard to the operating principles of the organization since this gives power to the users towards rectifying their behavior, resulting into less trouble on the platform.
Conclusion
In their latest rethinking, how moderation can be approached in Twitch and its associated problems will evoke mixed reactions, but can have positive effects. The focus has been shifting towards introducing expiring strikes, higher transparency, and offering educational courses in order to strike a healthy balance between punishment and education, helping the users to learn and develop rather than just banning them. This program’s effectiveness is yet to see but is indeed a brave decision that may affect the evolution of community moderation on platforms such as Twitch and beyond.
.
