Top ocean experts have proposed a radical new framework for sustainable fishing, challenging the flawed approach that currently dominates the industry. Their 11 ‘golden rules’ aim to minimize environmental impact, adapt to climate change, and support coastal communities, marking a decisive shift towards a more holistic vision for the future of our oceans.
Another Perspective On ‘Sustainable Fishing’
The researchers say the current idea of ‘sustainable fishing’ is no longer supported by science. This view is based on an over-simplified, catch-only approach to management; where any method of fishing is judged acceptable so long as the global total remains below a pre-determined threshold.
This way of thinking forgets the influence of important environmental–human and development processes which remain the main factors leading to the progressive decline of marine species, occupation habitats and fishing villages in all latitudes. The researchers say that to reduce its environmental impact and maximize social benefits, fishing must be managed according to a much broader suite of information integrating biological, oceanographic, social sciences and economic insights.
LEED Accreditation: Eleven Encouraging Ideas for the Future
Researchers have devised a futuristic plan to extract more fish from the sea — not by catching them one at a time in nets, but by deploying thousands of fish swimming robots capable of rounding up schools of tuna. Rules are derived from two guiding principles:
1. Fishing must be compatible with the conservation of marine species and habitats, able to adapt to climate change and capable of restoring our depleted marine life and habitats.
2. If the benefits of fishing are to be extended then fisheries must support the health, well-being and resilience of people and communities, especially those most vulnerable, not just a few large corporations.
This would include stipulations for among other things, appropriate use of fishing gear to mitigate environmental harm and measures to ensure local communities maintain rights and food security. The construction of such a broad-brush framework is to serve as a map for policymakers, retailers and industry players seeking the transition to a truly sustainable fishing paradigm.
Conclusion
The researchers’ suggestions mark a vital change in terms of how we manage the oceans. In criticizing the nonsensical idea of ‘sustainable fishing’ and offering a comprehensive vision it inaugurates real change in needed fishery policy. By following these 11 ‘golden rules’, marine ecosystems can be saved, vulnerable communities supported and the long-term future of our global food supply secured. It also puts forward a challenge to all players a call to collective action for the next generation of ocean management.
