In the world of biology, the relationship between an organism’s performance and temperature is crucial. This relationship, known as the thermal performance curve (TPC), plays a vital role in understanding and predicting the effects of climate change on various biological systems, from individual organisms to entire ecosystems. However, a new study by researchers from Imperial College London and other institutions has revealed a surprising finding: there is no single mathematical model that can accurately describe TPCs across all traits and taxonomic groups. This discovery has significant implications for how scientists approach the study of thermal biology and the development of predictive models.
Searching for the Universal TPC Model
Ectotherms, organisms that rely on external sources to regulate their body temperature, are particularly sensitive to changes in their thermal environment. The performance of their physiological, ecological, and life-history traits, such as growth rate, metabolic rate, and population dynamics, are strongly influenced by temperature. Identifying the most appropriate mathematical model to describe these thermal performance curves is crucial for a wide range of applications, from understanding cellular metabolism to forecasting the effects of climate change on ecosystems.
Over the years, researchers have developed numerous mathematical models to capture the shape of TPCs, which typically exhibit a unimodal and asymmetric pattern. Some of these models are based on mechanistic principles, derived from the underlying biochemical processes that govern trait performance, while others are phenomenological, focusing on capturing the overall shape of the curve.
The study by Kontopoulos et al. set out to determine if certain TPC models consistently outperform others, and whether the choice of model is influenced by factors such as the sampling resolution of the dataset, the type of trait being measured, or the taxonomic identity of the organism.
A Comprehensive Evaluation of TPC Models
The researchers compiled an impressive dataset of 2,739 thermal performance datasets, spanning over 100 traits from across the seven kingdoms of life. They then fitted a comprehensive set of 83 existing TPC models to this diverse collection of data.
The results were quite surprising. The researchers found that there was no single model that consistently outperformed the others across the entire dataset. Instead, model performance varied greatly, with no clear patterns emerging based on the sampling resolution, trait type, or taxonomic group.
Even for datasets with high-resolution temperature measurements (i.e., numerous distinct temperatures), the top-performing models typically had only three or four parameters, suggesting that more complex, parameter-rich models did not necessarily provide better fits.
Mechanistic Models Fail to Outshine Phenomenological Ones
One particularly unexpected finding was that mechanistic models, which are based on the underlying biochemical principles governing trait performance, did not consistently outperform the simpler, phenomenological models even for physiological traits that are more directly linked to specific biochemical pathways.
This suggests that the assumptions underlying the development of mechanistic TPC models, such as the idea that a single rate-limiting enzyme governs the shape of the curve, may not always hold true in practice. The researchers hypothesize that the complexity of biological systems, with numerous interacting processes contributing to the overall trait performance, may be better captured by the more flexible phenomenological models.
Implications and Recommendations
The findings of this study have important implications for how researchers approach the study of thermal biology and the development of predictive models. The researchers emphasize the importance of comparing multiple TPC models when analyzing thermal performance data, rather than relying on a single, arbitrarily selected model.
Additionally, they recommend that researchers consider using model averaging techniques, which combine the predictions of multiple models to obtain more robust and reliable estimates of the parameters of interest, such as the thermal optimum or critical thermal limits.
The researchers also caution against the assumption that more complex, parameter-rich models will necessarily outperform simpler alternatives, even for high-resolution datasets. This highlights the need for careful consideration of the statistical power and identifiability of model parameters when selecting the appropriate modeling approach.
In conclusion, the study by Kontopoulos et al. challenges the notion of a universal TPC model and underscores the complexity and diversity of biological responses to temperature. By embracing this complexity and adopting a multi-model approach, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the thermal biology of organisms and make more accurate predictions about the effects of climate change on natural systems.
For More Related Articles Click Here
